Wednesday, June 29, 2016

PLO 3



MATLT Program Learning Objective(s): Program Learning Outcome 3 “demonstrate knowledge and skills related to learning using ”technology-enhanced instructional strategies to support the needs of all learners.
This project illustrates the Multiple Intelligence of learning.  


Introduction

According to Howard Gardner, (Big Thinkers: Howard Gardner on Multiple Intelligences 2009), there are “different kinds of intellectual strengths”.  He also believes that “education that treats everybody the same is an unfair education. There are people who can only learn a specific way, in other words, they have different intelligences, and if those intelligences are not utilized in their everyday learning, then they’re being neglected by their teachers and the education system.   As such, Gardner has termed these 9 types of intelligences.
Prior MATLT Activity Program Learning Outcome 3
This prior assignment is from EDU648.  The assignment was about multiple intelligence and what educators can do to engage all these different learners.
Naturalist Intelligence (“Nature Smart”) –this intelligence, uses the human ability to discriminate among living things, as well as a sensitivity to other features of the natural world such as clouds and rock configurations.
Musical Intelligence (“Musical Smart”) – the ability to discern pitch, tone, and rhythm. People of this intelligence learn through music, such as learning multiplication by singing or rapping to aid in memorization of multiplication tables or vocabulary.
Logical-Mathematical Intelligence (Number/Reasoning Smart) – those with this intelligence has the ability to calculate, quantify, and carry out complete mathematical equations.
Existential Intelligence - this type of intelligence has the sensitivity and capacity to tackle deep questions about human existence, such as the meaning of life, why do we die, and how did we get here.
Interpersonal Intelligence (People Smart”) –an interpersonal intelligence has the ability to understand and interact effectively with others
Bodily-Kinesthetic Intelligence (“Body Smart”) - Athletes, dancers, surgeons, and craftspeople exhibit well-developed bodily kinesthetic intelligence.  They have the capacity to manipulate objects, while using a variety of physical skills to get their point across.
Linguistic Intelligence (Word Smart) –the linguistic intelligence is the ability to effectively think in words and use language to express meaning. 
Intra-personal Intelligence (Self Smart”) –this intelligence has the capacity to understand one’s self, thoughts and feelings and uses that knowledge in planning and directing one’s life
Spatial Intelligence (“Picture Smart”) –has the ability to think in three dimensions. Core capacities include mental imagery, spatial reasoning, image manipulation, graphic and artistic skills, and an active imagination. 

Principle and Theory Chosen and Why
I chose the MI principle and theory because technology has the capability to accommodate all nine multiple intelligence.  “Howard Gardner viewed intelligence as ‘the capacity to solve problems or to fashion products that are valued in one or more cultural setting’ (Gardner & Hatch, 1989).” (Smith, Mark K.  2002, 2008).  The “cultural setting” in today’s meaning would be our technological culture.
Once again, I will cite Gardner by saying, “education that treats everyone the same is an unfair education” (2009).   It is very important that we continue to recognize the various types of intelligence in teaching and learning.  We as educators know and understand that we cannot teach all our students the same way, they’re not all going to understand the subject.  Re-teaching doesn’t work most of the time, and modeling only works for a short period of time, so what do we do?  We get down to the root of the solution, “learning styles”. 
According to Gardner, “when children have an opportunity to learn through their strengths, they may become more successful at learning all subjects--including the basic skills."  However, when we neglect these types of intelligence in our students, we risk failing them and potentially destroying future livelihoods.  Many students will inadvertently be placed in programs that deemed them “learning disabled”, going through school stigmatized because we failed to recognize their unique ability to learn.

Challenges and How They Were Overcome
At first I was stumped as to how teachers will be able to help students incorporate their specific intelligence with the use of technology.  It turns out, there are many technological ways of implementing the use of multiple intelligence.  Learning tools, such as Imagine Learning, Accelerated Reading, Brain Pop, Spelling City, Frontrowed, envision, and wowzers are some of the tools that can be implemented in daily curriculum to help student achieve their goals.

Solving Problems
Many technological activities are related to multiple intelligence.  For example, many of the games that our students play, such as sports relates to physical/kinesthetic intelligence.  Some strategic games such as warfare and the likes, relate to logical/mathematical intelligence.  Crossword puzzles utilizes the linguistic intelligence, making a video of one’s self rapping to multiplication tables or to learn the alphabet is a musical intelligence, and so on. As educators, we must not fail our students, we must help them utilize their talents in the only place that they would not be judged because of their differences in learning.

Conclusion
According to Gardner, “education that treats everybody the same is an unfair education”.  This belief or understanding is what all educators should subscribe to.  As complicated, difficult, and unsupported as we may be, our priority as educators is to give every student the opportunity to use their talents to help them achieve their educational and social goals.



References:
Cast (n.d.). UDL at a glance. Retrieved from http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bDvKnY0g6e4.
 Smith, Mark K. (2002, 2008) 'Howard Gardner and multiple intelligences', the encyclopedia of informal education, Retrieved from  http://www.infed.org/thinkers/gardner.htm

No comments:

Post a Comment